Saturday, 28 February 2015

Is 'And Then There Were None' a orthodox detective story?


Is 'And Then There Were None' a orthodox detective story?

The definition for orthodox is following or conforming to the traditional or generally accepted rules or beliefs of a religion, philosophy, or practice. Therefore, my interpretation of an ‘orthodox detective story’ is a simple murder mystery that is extremely predictable throughout the storyline. In my opinion, ‘And Then There Were None’ was not an orthodox detective story. This is because I found my judgment continuously changing on each character and I was confused as to what would happen at the end of the story when the mystery was trying to be solved. ‘And Then There Were None’ was not a predictable story and I enjoyed the unique, different narrative and aspects to it.

Thanks for Reading,
Ebony Robinson

Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Factual Questions on The Speckled Band

Factual Questions on The Speckled Band

1.     Why does Helen Stoner seek Holmes’s help?
Helen Stoner is Holmes's client in the story "The Speckled Band". Her sister Julia died two years before the story takes place, after hearing a noise like a softly whistling kettle. Helen now occupies Julia's bedroom, and she hears that noise. She is understandably frightened. A friend of hers was a former client of Sherlock Holmes, so Helen goes to London to seek his help.

2.     Why did Dr. Roylott spend time in jail?
Dr.Roylott spends time in jail because he beat his Indian butler to the point of death after hearing the news regarding a break in to his house.

3.     According to Helen Stoner, what were the facts surrounding her sister’s death?
·      Helen Stoner says that her sister was in her nightgown, and that she was carrying a burned-out match and matchbox in her hand.
·      She also tells Holmes that the coroner tried to find evidence that would prove Roylott was involved in Julia's death. Everyone in the neighborhood knows he's dangerous, but no one has been able to find any actual proof that he murdered his stepdaughter.
·      Julia's windows were locked and barred, and there were no bruises or anything on her body. There's also no evidence of poison.

4.     Why would Dr. Roylott have been opposed to his stepdaughters marrying?
It turns out that Helen Stoner’s mum’s estate had originally been worth about 1,100 pounds a year in interest, but its value dropped to 750 pounds. Each of the girls, if married, is supposed to get 250 pounds in income. Which would leave Roylott with only 250 pounds a year of his own, enough to ruin him financially. So he's got a great motive for killing off Julia and Helen Stoner. 

5.     What peculiarities does Holmes find upon his inspection of the bedrooms?
·      It would be impossible to get into Miss Stoner's current room from the outside if the shutters were closed and barred from the inside.
·      The room itself is pretty bare, but there's a beautiful bell-pull, newer than all the other things in the room, that was installed just a couple of years ago. But Julia never used it, nor did she ask for it to be put in. As Holmes looks more closely, he finds that she couldn't have used it even if she wanted to, because it's not attached to anything.
·      Also, at the same time as the fake bell-pull was installed, a new ventilating duct was placed in the wall of the room. But it doesn't go outside it leads from Julia's bedroom to Roylott's.
·      There is a safe in Roylotts room. Miss Stoner says the safe must hold his business papers, but Holmes thinks otherwise – he suggests that an animal is inside, because there's a saucer of milk on top of the safe.
·      He also checks out the seat of Roylott's chair and then spots a small dog whip hung on a corner of Roylott's bed, tied in a loop.

6.     Why does Holmes want Miss Stoner to confine herself to her bedroom?
Holmes wants Miss Stoner to spend the night in her own room because he anticipates to spend the night in Julias old room with Watson in order to solve the mystery.

7.     How did Holmes know there would be a ventilator in the rooms?
Holmes knew about the ventilator prior to investigating the house becasue Julia was bothered by the smell of her stepdad's cigar smoke the night she died. Holmes also points out that it's pretty weird that the fake bell-pull and the ventilator were both put it in just around the time that Julia died.

8.     What happens to Dr. Roylott?
Dr. Roylott is killed, sitting in his wooden chair with that small leather dog whip across his chest. Around his forehead is a weird yellow band with brown spots that moves. It is a snake, an Indian swamp adder, that had killed him.

9.     What was the “speckled band?”
Dr. Roylott’s snake, an Indian swamp adder.

10. What was the relationship between England and India that enabled Dr. Roylott to move to Calcutta and start a medical practice?

11.  Can you find any peculiar facts in the story?
Majority of the facts and clues hidden throughout the story were peculiar and strange. For example the fake bell-pull installed in Julia’s room and the new ventilating duct that was placed in the wall of the room. And the fact it doesn’t lead outside, it leads from Julia's bedroom to Roylott's.

12.   What was the "Doctors' Commons?
The Doctors' Commons was a society of lawyers practising civil law in London. Like the Inns of Court of the common lawyers, the society had buildings with rooms where its members lived and worked, and a large library.

13.  What would Dr. Roylott's annual income have been if Helen Stoner got married?

Each of the girls, if married, is supposed to get 250 pounds in income. Which would leave Roylott with only 250 pounds a year of his own.

Thanks for Reading,
Ebony Robinson

Week 3 Homework Task - ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’ and ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ Comparison


‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’ and ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ Comparison:

The two short stories ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’ and ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ have the same storyline and genre, a murder that is investigated by one or more detective; a murder detective story. Each story maintains one or more detective trying to figure that puzzle in how the victim’s lives took a dreadful and violent turn. The detective in ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’, known as Dupin, outdoes the police by solving the seemingly impossible murder mystery centering on Morgue Street. Dupin is a discreet, private and determined detective and relies on clues in the murder scene to aid him in figuring the murder out. He notices hints out of the ordinary and pieces each one together in order to get a solved case and complete his job successfully. ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’s’ detectives were friends and colleagues to the victim, Patrick Maloney, whose wife accidently killed. The police try their best to figure out the mystery of how Maloney died but cant seem to figure it out, and instead let their guard down by enjoying some dinner and beverages on the murder scene, and always treating Mrs Maloney kindly. The difference between the two types of detectives in each of these two short stories is that Dupin is so unbelievably focused and never lets his guard down until the mystery is solved and his job is done, but the detectives in ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ do not fit the clues together, no matter their best efforts, and let their guard down by always treating Mrs Maloney kindly when they should have been solely focused on the task on hand. There were not many similarities between the detectives in each story.

Thanks for Reading,
Ebony Robinson